DOJ seeks censure of Minnesota judges for comments to The New York Times

The Hill · September 30, 2026Original source ↗

What happened

The Department of Justice is seeking to censure a sitting and a former federal judge in Minnesota for speaking to The New York Times regarding immigration issues related to the Trump administration. The judges involved are Patrick Schiltz and another unnamed judge.

Why it matters

This story highlights tensions between the judicial system and the executive branch regarding immigration policies.

How this story affects people

How does this story affect you if you are a federal judge?

This situation directly impacts your ability to speak publicly on sensitive topics, as it raises concerns about potential repercussions for expressing opinions on government policies. The censure could set a precedent that limits judicial independence and freedom of speech.

How does this story affect you if you are involved in immigration law?

This development may affect your practice and the legal landscape surrounding immigration issues, as tensions between the judiciary and the executive branch could lead to changes in how immigration cases are handled. The ongoing scrutiny of judges could also influence the decisions made in immigration courts.

Want this written about you?

The breakdown above is the shared version, for kinds of people. In the app, Ripple uses your job, your city, and your family, then writes that part about you.

Get your Ripple